In sub-Saharan Africa, a Shorter Walk to Water Saves Lives
In the fight against child mortality in the developing world, simple things make a big difference. A study by Stanford researchers shows that decreasing the amount of time families must walk to obtain clean water can help save the lives of young children.
In the fight against child mortality in the developing world, simple things make a big difference. A new study by Stanford researchers published by the journal Environmental Science and Technology shows that decreasing the amount of time families must walk to obtain clean water can help save the lives of young children.
More than a third of the world's population does not have potable water piped into the home. In sub-Saharan Africa, that number jumps to 84 percent. The Stanford study analyzed data from 26 African countries, where it is estimated that some 40 billion hours of labor each year are spent hauling water, a responsibility often borne by women and children. The Stanford study is the first quantitative analysis of the relationship between the time devoted to fetching water and health outcomes.
"The time that women devote to water fetching is time that can't be used for child care, food preparation, cleaning the household environment, or generating income," explained Amy Pickering, lead author of the study and postdoctoral fellow at the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment. "All of these factors can have direct influence on the health of children."
The study found that cutting the walking time to a water source by just 15 minutes can reduce under-five mortality of children by 11 percent, and slash the prevalence of nutrition-depleting diarrhea by 41 percent.
"There is a direct correlation between fetching times and the risk of illness and mortality among children in this region," said Jenna Davis, a professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and the Higgins-Magid Faculty Fellow at the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment.
The authors proposed several reasons that might explain the correlation. Longer fetching times could mean that people bring less water home and, therefore, ration more, leaving little water for hand-washing and other hygienic activities that decrease the spread of disease. Conversely, mothers who spend significant time fetching water may have fewer free hours to care for their children in ways that promote health, and may lose opportunities to earn income that might pay for more nutritious diets and improved health care.
In the near future, growing urban populations and climate change will threaten to further restrict access to freshwater. The researchers' analysis suggests that efforts to improve water supplies should focus not only on the quality, but also on the distances to water sources.
"Child health is often cited as a principal motivation for making water infrastructure investments. Traditionally, however, these investments have focused on improving the type of water source used, rather than the time or effort required to obtain it," said Pickering. "This is the first study that shows that other factors, especially fetching time, can play a significant role in improving child health."
Stanford ecologist and climate scientist Chris Field looks to the 28th UN Climate Change Conference for a roadmap on what he considers solvable challenges.
Visiting Scholar Lily Hsueh on why California's new climate disclosure laws could be a gamechanger.
Josheena Naggea of the Center for Ocean Solutions discusses how people in the tropics, or the 'tropical majority,' have invaluable expertise and knowledge of the ocean that is key to helping protect the high seas.