Uncommon Dialogues & Workshops
Knowledge leads to solutions when scholars join forces with members of affected communities to inform decision-makers. The Woods Institute facilitates that evolution by forging relationships and fostering dialogue between cross-sector experts, practitioners, resource managers, and community members who can best inform those who make and implement decisions affecting the environment.
The Institute plays an important role helping leaders and other decision-makers address sustainability challenges by serving as a trusted source of scientific research and a neutral convener of diverse interests with the ability to co-develop practical solutions to pressing environmental concerns. Uncommon Dialogues are the Woods Institute's signature method for convening cross-sector experts and stakeholders to surface and analyze research findings, economic influences, social insights and market or policy-based solutions to address specific environmental challenges. These invitation-only forums are designed and led by Stanford experts. The Dialogue format brings together business, government, NGO and foundation leaders together with experts from Stanford and other academic institutions for robust conversation and exchange of views. The aim is to create a two-way flow of information to improve decision-making as well as to identify knowledge gaps and potential areas of new research inquiry for Stanford scholars. The goals for Woods Uncommon Dialogues are to:
- Encourage constructive dialogue among strategic stakeholders on important environmental challenges
- Build trust and foster relationships between academia and the public and private sectors
- Ensure Stanford is contributing its knowledge to real-world decisions and actions
- Foster long-term partnerships and collaborations
Past Uncommon Dialogues have informed the formation of California's landmark Sustainable Groundwater Management Act, and brokered an agreement between hydropower companies and conservation/environmental groups that resulted in more than $2.3 billion in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law to implement the agreement. To learn more about how Woods dialogues operate or to propose a topic, contact Lea Rosehbohm, Associate Director for Policy and Engagement, at email@example.com
Climate Change, River Conservation, Hydropower and Public Safety
There are approximately 90,000 dams in the federal National Inventory of Dams. They serve many roles including electricity generation, flood control, irrigation, navigation, water supply, and recreation. Some dams, however, pose safety risks if they have not been properly maintained or have out-lived their useful lives. In 2018, Stanford University’s Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment and Steyer-Taylor Center for Energy Policy and Finance launched an “Uncommon Dialogue” among a group of key stakeholders to develop an agreement and action plan for these dams. Dialogue participants included non-governmental organizations, hydropower companies, trade associations, government agencies, tribes, universities, and investors. The dialogue resulted in a major agreement to address issues and opportunities with the nation’s 90,000+ dams built around the “3Rs”: rehabilitate some for safety; retrofit some for power; and remove some for conservation. Six Working Groups were launched to advance the 3Rs for the nation’s dams.
OUTCOMES: The agreement and follow-on Working Group efforts resulted in the inclusion of $2.3 billion in the 2021 Bipartisan Infrastructure Law to implement the Uncommon Dialogue agreement and several pending bipartisan bills to address multiple aspects of the 3Rs.
Ocean Acidification: Setting Water Quality Goals
In response to the West Coast Ocean Acidification and Hypoxia Science Panel’s Recommendation 3 (Revise water quality criteria), 25 experts were convened at Stanford University on October 17–18, 2016, to chart a path toward development of ocean acidification (OA) water quality goals. Participants were asked to help develop goals that in the short term could be used as management tools for defining monitoring needs and for interpreting modeling and monitoring output, and in the longer term could form the foundation for water quality criteria. The workshop had three objectives: 1) Identify the chemical parameters and biological indicators that are most appropriate for assessing the status of ocean acidification; 2) Prioritize the research needed to advance the parameters and indicators toward use as water quality goals; and, 3) Pinpoint the biggest impediments to development of criteria from these goals and actions that can be taken to lessen those impediments.